Articles  Reviews   Resources   Regulars   Lifestyle   Interactive   Search   About
~ Home ~ Articles ~ Reviews [Books~ Films and TV ~ Music]~ Dictionary ~ Library ~ Archives ~ Links ~ Salutes ~ Stakhanovites ~ Missives ~ The Mao of Pooh ~ Ask Uncle Rosa ~ Poetry ~ Subscribe ~ Contact Us ~ Search ~ The Turtle ~ Turtle People ~ Highlights ~
 
 

Welcome to The Dictionary of the Turtle!

   


©1998-2002 The Voice of the Turtle Collective

Welcome to the fledgling Dictionary of the Turtle!

This is a new kind of Power Tool, to refine thought, spread ideas and encourage militancy. When socialists demand that we Educate! Agitate! Organise!, the dissemination of radical ideas among the people becomes the first vital step in the process that culminates in social transformation. The Dictionary of the Turtle is a small contribution to this heroic narrative.

The dictionary has, of course, always been a creature of politics. Three hundred and fifty years ago in his Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argued that one of the most important functions of the political sovereign was to prevent violent civil strife by fixing the definitions of words in order to stabilise their meanings. This cannot be done -- however much the French state has tried over the centuries -- and the great modern reference books have always served to contest the signification of existing terms and practices as they try to establish new and authoritative interpretations of them. Three hundred years ago, Pierre Bayle's wonderful Dictionnaire historique et critique was written as a sustained attack on the religious bigotry of his time and it is still a captivating read. The Encyclopédie of Denis Diderot and the philosophes was a vital document of the eighteenth century Enlightenment; and our own century has seen a rash of classics, including three editions of the extraordinary Big Soviet Encyclopaedia.

The Turtle salutes its illustrious predecessors, and, like New Labour, the Dictionary of the Turtle aims to further these traditional values in a modern setting. It will be a dictionary of politics and culture, history and science. Although presentist in orientation, we believe that our contemporary tasks demand that we possess a comprehensive understanding of the past, and of the historical process itself.

As we assemble material for the project, we will slowly progress through the alphabet, and we hope to post the article on Zinoviev this side of the Millennium [We didn't get Zinoviev in by Y2K, but did manage Zidane,Zinedine, which is just as good -- Ed.].

Contributions are welcome, encouraged, required... If you think the Dictionary fails to reflect your own progressive concerns, submit the entries and we can Rectify the Anomaly!

Entries should above all be concise and original. They should contain a wealth of detail, but should not be reducible to a mere litany of facts. They should interpret, analyse, speculate. They must be fun to read. They can be as idiosyncratic or as controversial as they want to be, for there is no special demand for strict impartiality or an unattainable objectivity. Remember that excellent works of reference exist for all the major academic disciplines: we are not trying to replace these or to reduplicate them, but to produce a distinctive product of our own that can stand alongside.

Since dialectics is the science of being, all entries are subject to constant scrutiny and open to possible revision and adaptation. We hope that entries will evolve over time, and that as they do so, their roots in their original formulations will remain clear. If you spot errors or desire to modify or extend existing entries, please get in touch. Nothing is definitive. Everything is in flux.

We hope that many of the readers and subscribers of the Turtle will join us on this enterprise. For as Turtle-readers have long been aware, The Future Begins Now!

Go back to the Dictionary's front page.

   
   
   

 

 
   
         

Copyright Policy Last modified: , Home About Contact Us